Wear design > Wear > Lining guidelines for mining truck bodies

Lining at the tail

The tail is the area most exposed to wear, and there are various strategies to address this challenge. However, any solution that deviates from a flat plate design is likely to cause material sticking, which can result in increased carryback.

No lining

Reducing the weight by 10 tonnes and utilizing the extra capacity to haul ore can be the most cost-efficient option when hauling low-abrasive ore, with the body lasting 25,000-35,000 hours. Advances in materials now make it possible to build truck bodies using wear-resistant materials with structural capabilities, such as Hardox® 500 Tuf (approximately 500 Brinell). This innovation enables the option of running without a liner, even for medium-abrasive ore. The cost-effectiveness of this approach depends on weighing the expense of replacing an entire body against installing a new liner package, along with the benefits of hauling ore instead of 10 tonnes of steel. Typically, adding 5 mm of extra thickness to the floor structure is recommended to compensate for the absence of a liner. 

Conventional lining

This is the most common solution. It reduces the potential for carryback, discharges the fastest and has the lowest gravity point during discharge. 

Wear bars

Wear bars are a common solution primarily used to reduce the wear in the tail. In the weight calculation in the table below, the wear bars are installed on top a 20 mm liner plate. 

“Dead beds”

Reducing liner weight by cutting out rectangular holes is a proven method. This approach can be applied across the entire floor or specifically in the tail section. Dead beds aim to increase friction and trap ore within the pockets, significantly reducing weight compared to a solid plate. The figure below illustrates a dead bed and other tail solutions. 
The weight efficiency depends on the density of the ore that fills the holes. It is generally assumed that about 70% of the cut-out volume contributes to carryback. This trapped material can become highly compacted and take on a concrete-like consistency, with an estimated density of 80% of solid rock. 
For optimal performance, a dead bed lining requires a body with a well-maintained, flat floor structure. 

Waffle plates

Waffle plates are similar to dead beds, but with the advantage of generating less cut-off waste during production. However, designing waffle plates is more complex because the pieces must fit together like a puzzle. Another drawback is that the individual segments tend to be more slender, making it vital to incorporate radiused edges to minimize the risk of cracking. 

Grid structures

In copper mines, grid structures have been widely used. They can be easily manufactured by cutting 35-40 mm wide strips from a 15 mm Hardox® 450 or Hardox® 500 Tuf plate. The grid fills with ore, making it most effective for copper ore, which has a relatively low density.

Different solutions for reducing wear in the tail of a mining truck body.

The table presents the calculated weight per square meter for typical solutions, along with a summary of their benefits and drawbacks.

Tail solution
Tail solution
Wear bars
  • Low carryback
  • Heavy to install on top of lining
Steel
Kg/m2
223
Carryback
Kg/m2
-
Total
Kg/m2
223
Tail solution
Tail solution
Dead bed
  • Low weight
  • Can be used in the whole floor
  • Installed directly on floor structure
  • Need solid structural backing
  • Increased friction when unloading
  • Not effective when transporting highly dense ore
  • Complex manufacturing and installation
Steel
Kg/m2
52
Carryback
Kg/m2
20
Total
Kg/m2
72
Tail solution
Tail solution
Waffle plate
  • Low weight
  • Installed directly on floor structure
  • Need solid structural backing
  • Increased friction when unloading
  • Not effective when transporting highly dense ore
  • Complex manufacturing and installation
Steel
Kg/m2
122
Carryback
Kg/m2
8
Total
Kg/m2
130
Tail solution
Tail solution
Grid structure
  • Low weight
  • Flexible installation
  • Installed directly on floor structure
  • Low steel consumption
  • More welding at installation
  • Increased friction when unloading
  • Not effective when transporting highly dense ore
Steel
Kg/m2
58
Carryback
Kg/m2
48
Total
Kg/m2
107

Benefits and drawbacks of using different solutions to combat wear in the tail of a mining truck body.

Category and tags

Wear designWear

Contact Technical support


The information in this report is only applicable to SSAB’s products and should not be applied to any other products than original SSAB products. 


This report provides general results and recommendations for SSAB steel products. This report is subject to SSAB’s Terms of Use. It shall be the user's responsibility to verify that the information contained herein is correct and is suitable to be used for the particular purpose and application of the user. The report is intended to be used by professional users only who possess adequate expertise, qualification and knowledge for the safe and correct use of the results and recommendations in this report. This report is provided “as is”. The use of the report is at user’s own discretion and risk and that users will be solely responsible for any use of this report. SSAB disclaims any liability for the content or potential errors of this report, including but not limited to warranties and condition of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or suitability for individual applications. SSAB shall not be liable for any kind of direct or indirect damages and/or costs related to or arising therefrom, whether special, incidental, consequential or directly or indirectly related to the use of, or the inability to use, the report or the content, information or results included therein.